Teaching Examples


Flash Tutorials for the Complete Beginner
April 30, 2007, 12:32 pm
Filed under: Flash, journalism, online, training

After more hours than I’m willing to count, I’ve produced three 10-Minute Flash Tutorials aimed at journalists, photojournalists, students, and … whomever!

I debated whether to start with something more advanced, but in the end, I decided to try these because I thought I could make them as short as 10 minutes. Well, each one is less than 11 minutes, so — close enough!

These tutorials definitely start at zero. If you’ve never even opened Flash before, please try them.

I’m very, very eager to hear whether anyone likes them!

These are the first narrated “screencasts” or screen videos I have made. I’ve tested them on three different computers, and they seem to run well as long as there’s a broadband connection. So please take a look if you are one of those people who says, “I want to learn Flash!” — but you never have enough time. Surely you can spare 10 minutes?

Technorati tags: | | | | |



Good online journalism design work
April 29, 2007, 9:58 pm
Filed under: awards, design, Flash, graphics, journalism, online

SNDies award winners have been highlighted in a news posting at the SND Web site. Although the annual awards in the past have been decided in the late summer or early fall, for some unknown reason we now have “early SNDies.” Huh?

But in any case, these are interesting and varied examples of online journalism design and presentation. I had not previously see the Philadelphia 2006 homicides graphic — it’s a real winner! (Very effective interactivity.)

And if you have not seen Light Beneath the Streets, then have a look. Compare it with the excellent minute-by-minute graphic of the Virginia Tech shootings, which uses the same template. This is a good method for packaging this kind of work. It won’t work for every package, but you can see how versatile it is if you compare these two examples.

SND is the Society for News Design.

And hey, unlike the silly EPpy people, the SNDies people actually provide LINKS to the work! (Angela Grant has supplied us with links to many of the EPpy nominees.)

Technorati tags: | | | | | | | |



Survey results: What my readers said
April 28, 2007, 5:37 pm
Filed under: audiences, blogging, data, metrics, tools

A week ago, I posted a Wufoo survey here, and 173 of you were kind enough to complete it (108 said they are journalists). Thank you!

You can see the results in graphic format. It’s not the most user-friendly format I’ve ever seen, and it’s only the raw data, so it includes everyone who answered. I have downloaded all the data as a CSV file and will analyze it properly after I finish grading (yes, our semester ended Wednesday).

To see the questions I asked, look here.

Reading Habits

I asked: How does this blog fit into your other blog reading?

  • 70 selected: It is one of the top 10 blogs I read regularly.
  • 67 selected: I read a large number of blogs regularly, and this is just one of them.
  • 10 or fewer selected one of the other six answers.

I asked: Have you seen this blog before today?

  • 74 selected: I have your blog in my RSS feeds and check it often.
  • 46 selected: I check your blog often.
  • 19 selected: I check your blog occasionally.
  • 12 selected: Today is the first time I ever saw your blog.

There were four other answers, each with lower totals.

Preferred Content

I asked: You want to see more posts about … (tick only 3)

  • 58 selected: Online journalism packages (larger stories with multiple segments)
  • 51 selected: Video online
  • 42 selected: Flash
  • 41 selected: Newsroom reforms
  • 38 selected: Teaching online journalism
  • 37 selected: Interactivity

(This is one of the questions where doing a proper data analysis will yield more useful results; I can sort for regular readers, journalists only, etc.)

I asked: What type of post do you like MOST?

  • 51 selected: Tutorials and how-to posts
  • 49 selected: All of these, or I can’t pick just one
  • 22 selected: “Think pieces” or original essays
  • 16 selected: Links to examples at professional journalism sites
  • 14 selected: Critiques of specific online journalism work
  • 10 selected: Overview posts that provide links to several related posts or resources at other sites

I asked: What type of post do you like LEAST?

  • 60 selected: I like all of these, at least sometimes
  • 43 selected: None of these are a type I like LEAST
  • 18 selected: Summaries of other people’s very long articles or blog posts
  • 14 selected: Critiques of specific online journalism work
  • 12 selected: Overview posts that provide links to several related posts or resources at other sites
  • 12 selected: Tutorials and how-to posts

So, this is all pretty interesting to me (I don’t know about you). As I said, these are just the raw data, but it does make me think I should adjust some of my practices with this blog!

Technorati tags: | |



Information Graphics Workshop and Conference
April 28, 2007, 5:44 am
Filed under: data, graphics, journalism, news

June 3 through 5 at Michigan State. Take advantage of discounted registration until May 4. Details here. Check out the video interview with Nigel Holmes. Organized by Karl Gude.

No Flash and no animation, but there will be 3-D.

Technorati tags: | |



Five sites doing something right
April 27, 2007, 9:01 pm
Filed under: journalism, online

Hard to resist a challenge like this: Ryan Sholin invites us to write about someone, somewhere, doing it right. “Heck, tell me about five.”

He started us off with five of his own choosing.

Here are my five:

Santa Barbara Independent: This California arts and entertainment weekly recently redesigned its Web site, and it looks great! They offer good news coverage too.

Brady Lane’s ongoing video learning experience. Check out “On the Bus with Tex.” Lane has mastered time-lapse!

Missiles and Nuclear Installations of North Korea (Misiles e instalaciones nucleares de Corea del Norte): No words are necessary to explain what this animated graphic is saying (from El País). Have you ever seen a better use of satellite images? I haven’t!

The Bakersfield crew covering a local murder trial with tight, short, well-conceived videos. Check out how well these videos are titled, blurbed, and introduced! Davin McHenry says site traffic has doubled this week.

Meranda Writes: I’ve linked to this blog before, but I have to say I love the enthusiasm for journalism that I find here. If j-schools can send out young ones like this more often, I think we’ll be okay. Two examples: One about learning her craft in a place where the mentors have left; the other on why she chose journalism.

Technorati tags: | | |



Help improve this blog
April 27, 2007, 12:38 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

I’ve been running a survey since last Saturday. Tomorrow is the one-week mark, and I’ll be taking it offline about noon (-04:00 GMT). The survey’s goal is to show what this blog’s readers like, dislike, and want more of.

Please fill out my survey.

There are ONLY eight (8) questions! Please help!

Update (April 29): The survey is finished. To see the questions I asked, look here.



An internship you’d love
April 27, 2007, 4:15 am
Filed under: jobs, journalism, online

Rob Curley is looking for summer interns at Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive.

We want solid journalists who can write their backsides off. We’re also looking for programmers with an understanding of Django. And if you’re a kick-ass designer with killer Flash or motion-graphics skills, we want you.

Via Meranda Watling.

Technorati tags: | |



How to save a newspaper
April 26, 2007, 9:43 pm
Filed under: future, journalism, newspapers, online, television

A very fat issue of Nieman Reports came out a couple of months ago. I thought, yeah, I gotta read that … and put it off, and put it off. Well, today I started reading. You know what I mean. I have the table of contents open in Firefox. The titles are not very enticing, but I’m clicking into each one, reading the first graf, and seeing whether it gives me a reason to read further. For most of these articles, the result of that test is a “no.” I’m not saying they’re bad. (I haven’t read ALL of them yet!) They are well written. But the content is nothing new.

So I kept going until I got to Media Convergence: ‘Just Do It,’ by Ulrik Haagerup, editor in chief of Nordjyske Media in Aalborg, Denmark.

There’s more here than good writing.

There’s hope. There’s a positive attitude. And best of all, there’s a blueprint for turning the Titanic around.

… I asked if we could set two goals to work on together: It should be fun to be a reporter at Nordjyske, and together we should do good journalism.

Arms crossed, the reporters nodded to me in silence. Through the years they had built a reputation of being the heaviest union-controlled newsroom in Denmark and the one with the most strikes in the history of the Danish press. But now circulation was dropping like a piano thrown from a penthouse, and distrust and endless meetings about rules, procedures and contracts dominated daily life in the newsroom. Most of the reporters did their job, but not much more than that.

I was hooked right there. Because I know that the story is not going to end with those guys still sitting there, arms folded across their chests, nodding in silence.

I then told them that in 10 months our regional newspaper, now slipping into a deep crisis, would become the most ambitious media house in Europe. “It will be tough,” I reminded them, “but when we’ve made it, we’ll have a future in which it will be fun going to work every morning and a newspaper in which we will make good stories.”

Oh, man, isn’t that what all of us want? Who wouldn’t say yes to that?

Ten months later nearly the entire staff had changed jobs, offices, deadlines, editors, tools and colleagues. As we launched a new, more focused newspaper and added a free commuter paper aimed at younger readers in the big cities, in our community we introduced a regional version of CNN “Headline News.” These instant updates as part of local TV-news became an instant success. Within six months from our launch, we had more paid subscribers to 24Nordjyske, our cable TV station that broadcasts regional news 24 hours a day, than we had on our newspaper, which dates back to 1767.

Our 250 reporters — no, we didn’t fire anyone — are no longer organized into groups with the task to fill certain pages or sections in a newspaper. They work together in a matrix organization, all under the same editor in chief, and each with the same basic task of telling good stories to people in Northern Jutland using the media best suited to the telling.

We made it voluntary for newspaper reporters to work for radio or TV, or vice versa. We had to since their union contract did not specify anything about working for any other media than the one for which they were employed. In the beginning, nobody dared doing anything new. But when we stopped focusing on results and instead applauded the courage of the few reporters willing to try something new, suddenly more and more got the guts to take a chance at failure.

Telling good stories. Taking a chance. Rewarding risk-takers. What are you waiting for?

Technorati tags: | | | |



Making sense of Adobe’s CS3 bundles
April 26, 2007, 1:45 pm
Filed under: design, online, tools

Now that we have a confusing array from which to choose, a lot of us are trying to figure out which one is the best choice for our own needs.

JourneyEd (online shopping for students and faculty, with education pricing) has everything on sale now. Prices range from $600 for the “Design Premium” bundle of Adobe Creative Suite 3 to $250 for Adobe Flash Pro CS3 (that’s Flash alone, no bundle).

There’s also a licensing deal that colleges and universities can get from Adobe; it applies only to student purchases. (Other licensing plans exist.) Under the student license, “Design Premium” is only $299. Seven packages are covered:

  • Adobe Creative Suite 3 Design Premium $299
  • Adobe Creative Suite 3 Design Standard $199
  • Adobe Creative Suite 3 Web Standard $199
  • Adobe Creative Suite 3 Production Premium $299
  • Adobe Creative Suite 3 Master Collection $499
  • Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended $169
  • Adobe Acrobat 8.0 Professional $55

All prices are in U.S. dollars. “Each order must include a minimum of 25 units. A mixture of products and platforms may be used to meet this order minimum.”

There are a couple of things you should look at carefully before you decide on a bundle.

Dreamweaver CS3: Great for students learning to author in CSS and XHTML. But in a newsroom, depending on your CMS, maybe you don’t need this. If you use any Web authoring software, of course, this is the one to have. I’ve used Dreamweaver exclusively since about 2000. (Until then, I’d been coding entirely by hand since 1995.)

Flash Pro CS3 is included in every bundle EXCEPT “Design Standard.” Why would you buy a bundle without Flash? (Are you crazy?)

Adobe Photoshop CS3 “Extended” includes “tools for editing 3D and motion-based content.” I hear the integration with Flash is pretty interesting. Note that some bundles include plain Photoshop, not “Extended.”

“Web Standard” doesn’t include Photoshop at all. You can’t possibly live without Photoshop. That would be even crazier than not having Flash.

Soundbooth CS3 is not included in packages unless they also include Premiere. That is really stupid. Note that Soundbooth offers “tight integration with Flash CS3 Professional.” Okay, what if I do not want to do video? Or I already have another video editing application? Yes, exactly. This is Adobe’s cruelest bundling strategy: No audio software unless you buy a video bundle.

Interestingly, Adobe has not replaced Audition (which we use for audio editing in our college, and we like it very much). They even provide a comparison of Audition and Soundbooth.

Audition is not included in ANY of the CS3 bundles. Grrr …

My perfect bundle would be Flash, Photoshop Extended, Dreamweaver and Audition. (I would be willing to try Soundbooth instead.) That’s everything I use for Web production, authoring and editing. (I don’t edit video very often. I have used Premiere in the past. Now I have a Mac, and I’m learning iMovie. I also use QuickTime Pro on Windows to make fast edits on short videos.)

Anyway — make sure you check around and get the best pricing that’s available to you.

And all those stingy newspaper chains ought to get on the phone with Adobe and get some licensing deals, so I would stop getting e-mails from people who are still stuck with Flash 5 because their newsroom is too cheap to buy up-to-date software for them to use.

Technorati tags: | |



Tutorials for online journalism goodness
April 26, 2007, 4:01 am
Filed under: journalism, online, tools

Over at Journalistopia, lifelong Gator Danny Sanchez invites us to check out his Tutorials category. Wow! I follow his blog regularly, but I really didn’t realize how many great tutorials he has written or linked to.

One I had completely missed: Quick HTML bar graphs with Excel, Table Tango demonstrates a very simple way to get a nice graph online fast.

Other tutorials he has featured teach us how to create nifty maps, use CSS better, and make Photoshop do lots of useful stuff apart from the usual dodge and burn.

Technorati tags: |